High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/40074/2017disposed of

Parshant Kumar Rohilla And ORS v. State Of Haryana And ANR

2019-04-01Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No. M-40074 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : April 01, 2019 Parshant Kumar Rohilla and others ....Petitioners versus State of Haryana and another ....Respondents Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Fateh Deep Singh Present :

Mr. PK Rohilla, Advocate, for the petitioners Mr. Ripu Daman Singh, AAG, Haryana for the State/ respondent no. 1 Mr. Vikash Chaudhary, Advocate, for respondent no.2 Fateh Deep Singh, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners has made statement withdrawing the present petition qua petitioners no. 3 to 5. Allowed to do so.

Dismissed as withdrawn qua petitioners no. 3 to 5. Necessary note be given on the records of this petition. Report dated 8.3.2019 of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sonepat has been received after recording statements of accused/petitioners no. 1 and 2 Parshant Kumar Rohilla and Ashok Kumar as well as complainant/respondent no. 2 Surbhi and the learned court has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is an outcome of voluntariness, free will DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.04.05 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

Criminal Misc. No. M-40074 of 2017 (O&M) -2and without any coercion or undue pressure. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and in view of the fact that it is a pure matrimonial dispute and compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences and for betterment of their future life and more-so the offences for which the accused have been booked are not of very serious nature and in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others vs State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and in view of which the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of FIR No. 29 dated 18.5.2017 registered at Police Station Women Sonepat, under sections 323,34,406,498-A, 506 IPC and all consequences arising thereof are quashed, qua petitioners no. 1 and 2 Parshant Kumar Rohilla and Ashok Kumar. Petition qua petitioners no. 3 to 5 is dismissed as withdrawn. The petition stands allowed in those terms.

( Fateh Deep Singh ) April 01, 2019 Judge 'tiwana'

Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No Whether Reportable ?

Yes/No DALBIR SINGH TIWANA 2019.04.05 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.