Roma And ANR. v. State Of Haryana And ORS.




    
       Date of decision: 15th February, 2016  Roma and another

Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others

Respondents        !
  !
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, Asstt. Advocate General, Haryana for respondents No.1 to 3.

 !
"#  $ Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Satbir Singh has made a statement that the parents of petitioner No.1 Roma, namely Rambhaj and Jasviro (respondents No.4 and 5 respectively) have made statements before the police that they do not object to the marriage of petitioners and have no objection to the same, and has placed on record the said statements.

Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and nothing survives in the present petition, the same stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous. #  !
$  

%&'()'* "  +
 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.15 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court