← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/22042/2023dismissed

Vinay v. State Of Haryana

2023-05-02Mr. Justice Jagmohan Bansal2 pages

CRM-M-22042-2023 -12023:PHHC:062574

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22042-2023 Date of Decision : 02.05.2023 Vinay ......... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present :

Mr.S.S.Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL , J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that prosecutrix is a mature, grown up and married woman. She has not got divorced from her husband. She is in habit of lodging FIR against different persons with intent to mint money. She lodged FIR No.195 of 2017 under Sections 376 and 419 registered at Police Station Women Alwar, Rajasthan, FIR No.510 dated 03.08.2015 under Section 376 registered at Police Station Tizara and FIR No.121 dated 15.03.2014 under Sections 376D and 323 registered at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari. She time to time had made allegations against police officials as well as Government Pleader with intent to succeed her in evil designs. The petitioner and prosecutrix had entered into live-in relationship agreement. Notice of motion.

Ms. Dimple Jain, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and she pointed out that police report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. stands filed, however, petitioner is not assailing police report. ANJU GOEL 2023.05.02 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-22042-2023 -22023:PHHC:062574 On being confronted with the afore-stated fact, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. ( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 02.05.2023 anju Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANJU GOEL 2023.05.02 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document