← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCOCP/1486/2024disposed of

Bijender v. Virender Kumar Dahiya And Another

2025-08-28Mrs. Justice Alka Sarin2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

COCP-1486-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 28.08.2025 Bijender ... Petitioner

Versus

Virender Kumar Dahiya and Another ... Respondents CORAM :

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present :

Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raj Karan Singh Brar, AAG Haryana.

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral) 1.

Present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for alleged willful disobedience of order dated 09.01.2023 passed in CWP-6516-2022. 2.

The operative portion of order dated 09.01.2023 passed in CWP6516-2022 reads as under : " 4.

So far as the petitioner No.1 is concerned, by filing status report, on affidavit, dated 12.10.2022, it has been stated by respondents that in case the petitioner No.1 files the necessary application, under Rule 12 (4) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Rules, 1964, as applicable to the State of Haryana, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

5.

If the application(s) for the above purpose have JITENDER KUMAR 2025.08.29 08:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

COCP-1486-2024 -2already been moved, the same shall be decided within four months from today.

6.

For ensuring that the ends of justice are not defeated, it is also deemed imperative to order that till a decision on the above application(s) are made by the Competent Authority, thereupto the order of eviction, as made in respect of the disputed lands, may not be enforced."

3.

Present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was respondent No.6 in CWP-6516-2022.

4.

Learned State counsel has pointed out that the representation of both the writ petitioners in CWP-6516-2022 have since been decided and they have been found entitled and their claim has been approved. 5.

In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the same is disposed off. Rule stands discharged. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off. ( ALKA SARIN ) JUDGE 28.08.2025 jk NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO JITENDER KUMAR 2025.08.29 08:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh