Vikram Roop Rai And ANR. v. State Of Punjab And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-43285-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 10, 2015 Vikram Roop Rai and another .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.Dilpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr.Hitesh Kaplish, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.P.S.Paul, DAG, Punjab for respondent No.1.

Mr.B.B.S.Randhawa, Advocate for Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

........

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) Mr.Dilpreet Singh, learned proxy counsel for the petitioners, submits that he has the instructions to withdraw the present petition.

Learned counsel for the State as well as counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 has no objection to the above prayer. Dismissed as withdrawn.

August 10, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2015.08.11 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh