Usha Rani And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19411-2019 DECIDED ON: 07.05.2019 USHA RANI AND ANR.

...PETITIONERS..

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

...RESPONDENTS..

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: Mr. Arun Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Davender Gorsi, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Munish Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

***** RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel producing status report by way of affidavit of Mr. Krishan Kumar, DSP (II), Kaithal along with investigation report, contends that instant petition has rendered infructuous, as no alleged protection is required, in view of the statements of the private respondents.

In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

07.05.2019 (RAMENDRA JAIN) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No SONIKA 2019.05.08 15:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh