Narinder Kaur @ Preet v. State Of Punjab

CRM-M No. 40527 of 2017 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No. 40527 of 2017 (O&M) Date of decision : 19.1.2018 ...

Narinder Kaur @ Preet ................Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab .................Respondent Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan Present: Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Saurav Khurana, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. ...

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has since joined the investigation and has furnished an affidavit that the petitioner does not hold any passport.

Learned state counsel, on instructions from ASI Gurdeep Singh, concede these facts, further stating that since the petitioner has joined the investigation and no recovery is to be effected from her, therefore, she is not required by the local police for further investigation.

In these circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 10.11.2017 is made absolute, subject to Banita Chugh 2018.01.19 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh

CRM-M No. 40527 of 2017 -2fulfillment of conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition in that way is allowed.

It is made clear that in case the petitioner is found to be indulging in any criminal activity, after being granted bail vide this order, the order shall be liable to be withdrawn. ( H.S. Madaan ) Judge 19.1.2018 chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No Banita Chugh 2018.01.19 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh