Raj Pal Sekhon v. State Of Haryana & ANR.
Date of decision: 19th September, 2015 Raj Pal Sekhon Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and another Respondents ! ! 1.
Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2.
Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present:
Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana with ASI Naresh Kumar, PS Sector 40, Gurgaon. None for respondent No.2.
!"# $ Present petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Raj Pal Sekhon in case FIR No.76 dated 01.03.2014 registered at Police Station Sector 40, District Gurgaon under Sections 406/420/467/468/471 IPC. Vide order dated 09.02.2015 while issuing notice of motion, the petitioner was granted interim bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.19 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has settled the matter with the complainant and has paid him an amount of 57.00 lacs which he had claimed and the fact that he has joined investigations in pursuance to the orders of this Court has not been controverted on behalf of the State by Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana on instructions from ASI Naresh Kumar, PS Sector 40, Gurgaon. In the light of these circumstances, the interim bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 09.02.2015 is made absolute on the same terms and conditions till submission of report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. (challan). Thereafter, petitioner will be permitted to furnish regular bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petition stands disposed off accordingly. # !$ !%&'%()%* +"
RATTAN PAL SINGH 2015.09.19 15:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court