Shilpa Kwatra And ORS v. State Of Haryana & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40480-2015 Date of Decision: February 05, 2016 Shilpa Kwatra and others .....Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.P.L.Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr.S.K.Saini, AAG, Haryana.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complaint has been withdrawn by the complainant from learned trial Court and, as such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

Learned counsel for the State has not controverted the aforesaid fact.

Ordered accordingly.

February 05, 2016 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE MEENU 2016.02.08 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document chandigarh