Raj Kumar v. Sham Lal And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH RSA-4927-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision:-11.03.2026 Raj Kumar ......Appellant

Versus

Sham Lal and Others ........Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present:

Mr Deepak Jain, Advocate, for Mr. Akshay Jain, Advocate, for the appellant. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL , J. (Oral) 1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that his client is not in contact with him and, therefore, prays that the present appeal may kindly be dismissed for non-prosecution with liberty to seek revival of the same, if any cause of action arises. 2.

In view of the above, and considering the fact that the present appeal pertains to the year 2001, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the appellant to seek revival of the same, if so advised, as per law. 3.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 11.03.2026 anil Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No