Jarnail Singh Dhanoa v. Union Of India And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

 

CWP No.10175 of 2024 Date of Decision:03.05.2024 Jarnail Singh Dhanoa ....Petitioner vs.

Union of India and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Amardeep Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Amit Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for the Union of India *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to re-issue him passport.

2.

Mr. Amit Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for Union of India, who on advance notice is present in Court, at the outset, submits that application of the petitioner already stands closed. If he files a fresh application seeking passport, it would be decided expeditiously. 3.

Counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 4.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of.

(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 03.05.2024 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2024.05.03 02:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document