Budh Ram v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam And ANR

  

      



 

  !"#"

$%&'() * +, --

"

"

$ . / .#*#

..'$/"

.$.#.$"0,1 -$ $

+ .-- #2 $ $ #

&%  31 &- 4 4&4 4  .

# $ %
 

 

 

   4&4 4   -5 16    

   

 

   

 

   

                



 

       

  

      

 

   

 

!"



   #Kesar Chand Vs. State of Punjab and others', AIR 1988 Punjab 265.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is suffering prejudice due to the said act of the respondents as the petitioner is getting the pension much less than his entitlement. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that even the ACP has not been granted to the petitioner as per his entitlement.

      

      

   $ 

 

      

  

    

$  %&'()')%*+,-./ 

   SARITA RANI 2022.05.30 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment



 

   



  

         

     $      

0% 

        0 $ 
 $1$2 $   

   





    

     3  

  %&'()')%*+,-./ $  $     4

 $$ 

$ 

   

   $ 

  



    $  $

  %&'()')%*+,-./ 

           

    0% 

   %&'()')%*+,-./  



  $

  

   54&4 4 6  

&'()   

 5  6  

   7 0 SARITA RANI 2022.05.30 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment