Sunil Jindal v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-20446-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-13.8.2020 Sunil Jindal ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. Sartaj Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anshul Gupta, Advocate for the complainant. (the aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in Virtual Court) ***** GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the parties have amicably resolved their issues and have entered into a compromise and that the petitioner shall shortly be filing a petition for quashing of FIR on grounds of compromise.

The aforestated position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the complainant, who has endorsed the fact that the parties have indeed amicably resolved their issues.

In view of the aforestated position, the petition is accepted and it is ordered that, in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail PANKAJ KAKKAR 2020.08.13 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

( 2 ) CRM-M-20446-2020 (O&M) subject to his furnishing personal bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

13.8.2020 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2020.08.13 14:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document