Divya Sharma v. Ut Of Chandigarh & ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40919-2015 Date of decision:25.05.2016 Divya Sharma

...Petitioner

Versus

State of UT, Chandigarh & Ors.

...Respondents

CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh

Present:

Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Anil Kumar Landharia, Addl. P.P. for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate for the complainant.

**** 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ***** Kuldip Singh , J.(Oral) The prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C is for quashing of FIR No. 109 dated 12.03.2015 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 279, 337 of IPC at Police Station Sector 11, Chandigarh, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2).

Report of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh has been received wherein it has been reported that neither the complainant Puneet Kumar nor victim Tulsi Ram appeared before the Court to get their statement recorded. Hence, the petition for quashing of FIR No. 109 dated 13.03.2015 (Annexure P-1) registered under Sections 279, 337 of IPC at SATYAWAN 2016.05.27 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh

CRM-M-40919-2015 -2Police Station Sector 11, Chandigarh, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) stands dismissed.

(KULDIP SINGH) 25.05.2016 JUDGE sp SATYAWAN 2016.05.27 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court Chandigarh