Rajinder Kumar Jain v. State Of Punjab And ORS

CRM-M-4092-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-4092-2015 Date of Decision: September 8, 2015 Rajinder Kumar Jain

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr. Atul Goyal, Advocate, for Mr. Arnav Sood, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. K.S. Pannu, DAG, Punjab, for the respondents.

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J. (Oral) Learned proxy counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to plead that the charge-sheet (report under Section 173, Cr.P.C.) has been presented, therefore, present petition has been rendered infructuous. He prays for withdrawal of PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.09.09 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-4092-2015 the same.

Learned counsel for the State on instructions from ASI Harmesh Lal of Police Station, Bullowal, District Hoshiarpur, very fairly concedes that the charge-sheet has been presented and he has no objection to the above prayer.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

September 8, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) Pkapoor JUDGE PRASHANT KAPOOR 2015.09.09 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document