State Of Haryana And Others v. Khajan Singh And Another
!
" ! #
!$%& '( !&) * '
+ ,- .- /%$%& '( $01$ '%3&0*
--- 44&55$ %* 6&0*7*
83$9$
/
:3 '%3&0
--- &*4'
2& %* + ;
/ / / / ;
/ ! 8 !
!
"
$
#%
$
$ &
# '
( "
$
#%
$
$ &
) *
% +, + !+!)
.
./!(0)!+!+
!,
,3( 4
5,3(
67
1
$
8
!,
,3(
9
:
%
!,
,3(
%
%
#
!,
,3(
% %
:
%
%
% %
$
) / #
#
; $
$
!,
,3(
%
%
%
;
% 6 % . *
!"#"" $$%
$
6 %
. *
&'$( )#*+ )%, ! "
- ..
/ 0 .$
1
2
)!, ! 3 $
!,
,3(
<# !)
%
=25.From the analysis made hereinabove on the relevant provisions of the Act and the judgments relied upon by the parties, we are inclined to hold that even a second application made under Section 28-A of the Act after the award passed by the High Court is maintainable and entitled to be considered by the Collector/LAO. We are of the view that, entertaining an earlier application filed under Section 28-A of the Act on the basis of the award of the Reference Court followed by the receipt of money, shall not act as a bar for the same applicant to seek further re-determination of compensation on the basis of the award passed by the High Court or this Court." , 1
% >
!,
,3(
%
%
+ "
$
#
.
% !
.
/ / /
! ! 8 !
!
,<
aarti Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes Whether reportable :
No