Tarsem Lal And ANR v. State Of Haryana

2023:PHHC:070415 In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh CRM-M-24578-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision:-16.5.2023 Tarsem Lal and another ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana ... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL Present:- Mr. U.K. Agnihotri, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana.

***** FIR No.

Dated Police Station Section/s 13.2.2021 Chandi Mandir, District Panchkula 61 of Punjab Excise Act, 1914 read with Section 420, 120-B of Indian Penal Code and Sections 7, 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral) 1.

The petitioners seek quashing of the aforementioned FIR. 2.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the points as have been raised herein before the Trial Court at appropriate stage including their plea to the effect that they were possessing a "Pass" in respect of the liquor bottles seized at the spot, which are mentioned in the FIR.

PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.05.16 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M-24578-2023 (O&M) ( 2 ) 2023:PHHC:070415 3.

In view of the aforesaid submission, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

16.5.2023 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No PANKAJ KAKKAR 2023.05.16 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document