Jainul Abedin v. State Of Haryana

TAPINDER SINGH MANN 2016.03.15 11:44 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Cr. Misc. M 41063 of 2015 Date of decision:- 14.3.2016 Jainul Abedin Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana Respondent

Present:

Mr. BS Chowdhary, Advocate.

Mr. CS Bakshi, Addl.A.G. Hry M.M.S.BEDI,J.

On the instructions of ASI Narender, it has been informed that the petitioner has joined the investigation and has not been able to produce the shoes but he claims that shoes were purchased by him under the bona fide belief on payment of consideration. He has placed reliance on bill (Annexure P-3). The petitioner has been involved in the case on the basis of the statements of co-accused Ramesh, Ashok and Sandeep made during the period they were in custody.

The petitioner having joined the investigation; recoveries having not been effected from him, the petitioner can be granted the concession of pre-arrest bail as it does not appear to be a case where the petitioner should be sent in custody.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner, he will be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition that he will join the investigation as and when required by the police and will not tamper with evidence or hamper the investigation. The petitioner will not indulge in the similar activity, of which he is accused of, during pendency of the trial. March 14 ,2016 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE