Nishant Singh v. State Of Haryana And Others

CWP-11923-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (102) CWP-11923-2024 DATE OF DECISION:- 12.07.2024 NISHANT SINGH ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Col. N.R.Dahia (Retd.) for the petitioner.

Mr. Aman Bahri, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for respondent No.2 Mr. S.K.Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3.

Ms. Palak Jain, Advocate for Mr. Gopal Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5.

...

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1.

By way of present writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has approached this Court inter alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No. 4 and 5, to enter the name of the petitioner in the register of the Haryana State Pharmacy Council and Pharmacy Council, and to issue the license to him.

PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.07.12 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

CWP-11923-2024 -22.

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.6, and has filed Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 3.

Counsel representing respondents No.4 and 5 submits that petitioner's name has been registered as a Pharmacist. She has placed on record a xerox copy of the Registration Certificate, which is taken on record. A copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. 4.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has become infructuous.

5.

Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 12.07.2024 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2024.07.12 15:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.