High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/42209/2018disposed of

Sukhwinder Kaur v. State Of Punjab

2019-03-26Mrs Justice Daya Chaudhary1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No. M-42209 of 2018 Date of decision: 26.03.2019 Sukhwinder Kaur ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ..Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

Present:

Mr. Mikhail Kad, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Ruchika Sabharwal, AAG, Punjab for the respondent -State.

*** Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined investigation and the same has been affirmed by learned State counsel on instructions from SI Jagraj Singh. However, learned State counsel has opposed grant of interim bail to the petitioner on the ground that recovery has not been effected so far whereas as per stand of learned counsel for the petitioner, on the same set of allegations, interim order passed in favour of co-accused is made absolute. Since the petitioner has joined investigation, interim order dated 01.10.2018 passed by this Court in her favour is made absolute. Petition is disposed of accordingly.

However, the petitioner is directed to join investigation, if required by the Investigating Officer.

26.03.2019 (DAYA CHAUDHARY) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No NEETU RANI 2019.03.28 10:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh