Sham Sunder v. State Of Haryana And Another

2023:PHHC:097458

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-22776-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.07.2023 SHAM SUNDER ... Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. RS Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rupinder Singh Jhand, Additional AG Haryana. **** HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral) Prayer in this petition is for quashing FIR No.299 dated 06.04.2022, registered under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, at Police Station Yamuna Nagar City, District Yamuna Nagar, along with all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. At the outset, learned State counsel submits that the investigation is till going on.

Upon this and after arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner will move a representation/application within two weeks from today and he would be satisfied if the said representation/application is ordered to be considered by the Investigating Officer.

Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection if the aforesaid limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed.

AMAN JAIN 2023.07.31 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CRM-M-22776-2023 (O&M) -2In view of the above and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a representation/application for redressal of his grievances, within two weeks from today, if so advised. On his doing so, the Investigating Officer concerned, is directed to consider the said representation, as per law. 31.07.2023 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) Aman Jain JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No AMAN JAIN 2023.07.31 17:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document