← Library
High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCWP/11418/2022dismissed

Jagbir Kataria v. State Of Haryana And Another

2022-05-25Mr. Justice Arun Monga2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Item No.125 CWP-11418-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: May 25, 2022 Jagbir Kataria

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and Another

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

Present:

Mr. Vikas Malik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl.A.G., Haryana.

***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus for directing respondent No.2 to decide representations dated 02.05.2022 and 10.05.2022 (Annexures P-4 and P-5 respectively), whereby the petitioner has claimed his promotion to the post of Kanungo in SC category being eligible and due to post fallen vacant on account of promotion of earlier Kanungo to the post of Naib Tehsildar.

2.

Succinct facts first. Petitioner was appointed as Patwari on 05.07.2013 in SC category in the office of respondent No.2. There are 10 posts of Kanungo in district Rohtak, out of which two posts are reserved for SC category. He had qualified the examination for the post of Kanungo in the year 2016 and is eligible for promotion to the post of Kanungo in SC category as per seniority list (Annexure P-2) of Patwaris as on 01.03.2020. Despite post fallen vacant due to promotion of Mr. Kailash Chander Kanungo to the post of Naib Tehsildar vide order dated 29.04.2022 (Annexure P-3), the petitioner has not been promoted. The petitioner then submitted representations dated 02.05.2022 and 10.05.2022 ASHISH 2022.05.27 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP-11418-2022 (O&M) -2- (Annexures P-4 and P-5 respectively), but to no avail. Hence the instant petition.

3.

Learned State counsel, on advance service, joins proceedings and opposes issuance of notice of motion. 4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the case file.

5.

No grounds to interfere are made out.

6.

Dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his representations before the competent authority, if so advised. (ARUN MONGA) JUDGE May 25, 2022 ashish Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No   ASHISH 2022.05.27 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document