Poonam Rani v. State Of Haryana And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH Item No.124 CWP-11417-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: May 25, 2022 Poonam Rani
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and Another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present:
Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Middha, Addl.A.G., Haryana.
***** ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing order dated 31.12.2021 (Annexure P-6), whereby contractual services of the petitioner have not been extended though the services of other two contractual employees, who are lower in qualification, has been extended. 2.
Govt. of Haryana introduced Outsourcing Policy Part-II for engagement of persons on contractual basis, to fill up vacancies where regular posts exist. Respondent No.2 published notice dated 28.05.2018 (Annexure P-2), inviting applications to fill up three posts of Clerks on temporary basis.
3.
Petitioner participated in the selection criteria and was appointed to the post of Clerk. Govt. of Haryana has also issued instructions that the contractual persons (Outsourcing Policy Part-I and Part-II) already engaged against regular posts may be adjusted until regular employment is made against said post. Though the petitioner has not been relieved but on the other hand her contractual period has also not been extended, although 8 posts of Clerks are shown as vacant.
ASHISH 2022.06.01 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-11417-2022 (O&M) -24.
On advance service, learned State counsel appears and submits that a decision will be taken by the competent authority by passing a speaking order, in case the petitioner moves a representation.
5.
Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.
6.
Without commenting on the merits of the case, the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner moves a representation within a period of two weeks, the competent authority shall decide the same, of course subject to the verification of workload, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law.
(ARUN MONGA) JUDGE May 25, 2022 ashish Whether speaking/reasoned :
Yes/No Whether reportable :
Yes/No ASHISH 2022.06.01 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document