Ramesh v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.41447 of 2014 Date of Decision: 17.03.2015 Ramesh ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Rajesh K. Sheoran, Addl. .A.G., Haryana.

**** 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? 2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (Oral) Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.135 dated 05.05.2014, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, Police Station Shivaji Colony, Rohtak.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name only appeared on account of disclosure statement of co-accused. Petitioner has no antecedent behavior of any criminal activity in any other case. The alleged complexity of petitioner is on account of co-accused SACHIN SHARMA 2015.03.17 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

CRM-M No.41447 of 2014 belonging to his village. Petitioner never made visit nor met Arun Kumar. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, challan stands presented and the trial being magisterial, would take long time to conclude keeping in view the total number of cited witnesses in the challan.

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and keeping in view the period of custody of the petitioner w.e.f. 07.06.2014, petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. However, the petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. 17.03.2015.

[RAJ MOHAN SINGH] sachin JUDGE SACHIN SHARMA 2015.03.17 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document