M/S Shivani Woollen Mills, Panipat v. Union Of India And Others

IN T THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJ JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CWP-12183-2021 (O&M Date of Decision: 12.08.20 PAT CHANDIGA M) M/S SHIVA ANI WOOLLEN MILLS, PANIP . . . . Petition ner Vs.

INDIA AND OTHERS UNION OF . . . . Responde nts **** HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SA

CORAM:

ANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ANJAY VASHISTH **** Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

**** PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Ora

Present

SANJEEV al) ned counsel for the petitioner

1. Learn states that the petition has be een rende red infructuous and prays for wi ithdrawal of the same.

2. Allow wed to do so.

3. Writ P Petition stands dismissed as havi ing become infructuous.

4. All pe ending applications also stand di isposed of accordingly.

(SA NJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA A) JUDGE (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE August 12, Mohit goyal Yes/No Yes/No

1. Whet

2. Whet ther speaking/reasoned?

ther reportable?

MOHIT GOYAL 2024.08.13 11:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document