Mubarik v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-42352 of 2016 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-42352 of 2016 Date of Decision: 18.04.2017 Mubarik ....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Arjun Atri, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanun Sharma, AAG, Haryana.

******* SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 120 dated 08.09.2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 5 and 13 (2) of the Haryana Gauvansh Sanrakshan and Gausamvardhan Act, 2015, at Police Station Rozka Meo, District Mewat. Heard.

Learned State counsel on instructions from HC Sumer Singh submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for custodial interrogation.

In view of submission of learned State counsel but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed and order dated 19.01.2017 is made absolute till the presentation of challan, subject to the following terms:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the police as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make Jitender Kumar 2017.04.19 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH any inducement, threat or promise to any person

CRM-M-42352 of 2016 -2acquainted with the facts of the accusation against him so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

(iv) that the petitioner will seek regular bail on the presentation of challan in Court.

April 18, 2017 ( SURINDER GUPTA ) jk JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Jitender Kumar 2017.04.19 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH