Champa Devi v. State Of Hry. And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4494-2005 Date of decision: 12.09.2024 Champa Devi

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present:

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.

***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer made in the present petition is for seeking family pension. 2.

Learned State counsel, while referring to the written statement, submits that on account of the charge-sheet having been issued to the husband of the petitioner under Rule 7 for remaining absent, a regular enquiry was conducted and his services came to be terminated vide order No. 1853/TA dated 26.06.1992.

3.

In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 12.09.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No HAMANT 2024.09.13 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment