High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/4158/2017dismissed

Manjeet Singh v. State Of Haryana

2017-04-19Mr. Justice Harinder Singh Sidhu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM No.M-4158 of 2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: April 19, 2017 Manjeet Singh

...Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH

Present:

Mr.A.P.S.Deol, Senior Advocate with Mr.H.S.Mavi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.B.S.Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

Mr.Gurvinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the complainant.

**** INDERJIT SINGH, J.

Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.121 dated 12.11.2015 under Sections 302, 341, 323, 34, 147 and 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Rori, District Sirsa.

Notice of motion was issued. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant appeared and contested the petition. I have heard learned counsel for the parties as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. First of all, I find that complainant and eye witnesses are stated Vineet Gulati 2017.04.20 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

CRM No.M-4158 of 2017 -2to have been examined. The present petitioner Manjeet Singh is stated to be in the vehicle along with other co-accused and they all were carrying lathis and sticks. It is the allegation that accused pull down father of the complainant, who was sitting pillion on the motorcycle and all of them including the petitioner, started beating him with an intention to kill him, which shows that present petitioner has also taken active part in the commission of the offence.

Earlier, 2-3 injuries were found in the post-mortem examination. As argued, again a Medical Board was constituted and it found seven more injuries in addition to the injuries already found by previous Board of Doctors.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of the nature and gravity of the offence, I do not find it a fit case where petitioner is entitled to benefit of regular bail. Therefore, finding no merit in the present petition, the same is dismissed.

April 19, 2017 (INDERJIT SINGH) Vgulati JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No Vineet Gulati 2017.04.20 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh