Krishana v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ......

Criminal Misc. No.M-42605 of 2018 .....

Date of decision:03.10.2018 Krishana

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. R.K. Girdhwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Virk, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State.

.....

Inderjit Singh, J.

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.187 dated 23.3.2018 registered for the offences under Sections 148, 149, 323, 341, 506, 307, 302 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Sadar Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar. Notice of motion to Advocate General, Haryana. Mr. B.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record. The petitioner is named in the FIR. In the FIR, no specific HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.10.04 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-42605 of 2018 [2] weapon or injury has been attributed to the petitioner. As per the learned State counsel, the present petitioner caused simple injury to witness Nasib. As per the FIR, there are other six male members named in the FIR with weapons. Earlier the FIR was registered only for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 506 IPC etc., but later on the offences under Section 307 IPC and then under Section 302 IPC have been added. As per the prosecution version, no injury has been caused by the present petitioner to the deceased.

Therefore, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of the fact that the petitioner is a lady and has been in custody since 14.3.2018; the trial of the case is likely to take long time, no useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case. Hence, without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to her furnishing personal bond in the sum of `50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.

October 03, 2018.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.10.04 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh