High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/41750/2014dismissed

Amrit Pal Singh v. State Of Punjab

2015-02-26Mr. Justice S.C. Malte2 pages

Criminal Misc.No.M-41750 of 2014 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-41750 of 2014 Date of Decision: February 26, 2015 Amrit Pal Singh

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI

Present:

Mr.J.S.Gill, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr.Shilesh Gupta, Addl.AG, Punjab.

Ms.Kulwinder Kaur, Advocate, for the informant.

Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.(Oral) Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, Amrit pal Singh, who has been booked for having committed the offences punishable under Sections 148, 302, 307, 323, 364 and 506 read with Section 149, IPC, and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, in a case arising out of FIR No.105, dated 16.4.2012, registered at Police Station, Tripri Town, District Patiala.

Learned counsel contends that similarly situate coaccused of the petitioner i.e Harbans Singh, who is father of the petitioner, has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated SEEMA RANI 2015.02.26 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Criminal Misc.No.M-41750 of 2014 [2] 18.09.2013 and that the petitioner is behind the bars for the last approximately three years and as such, he be granted bail. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has pointed out that the allegations against the petitioner are that he along with his co-accused not only gave beating to Tejinder Singh (since deceased) and thereafter, the petitioner along with his few co-accused abducted Tejinder Pal Singh in a vehicle, caused injuries and threw him out of the car at some distance , later he (Tejinder Singh) succumbed to the injuries. He further pointed out that the prosecution has already closed its evidence and even the statements under Section 313, Cr.P.C, of the petitioner and his co-accused have been recorded and the case is now fixed for 27.02.2015 before learned trial court for defence evidence.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the material available on record and further keeping in view the stage of the trial, no ground for grant of bail to the petitioner is made out.

Dismissed.

February 26, 2015 (Naresh Kumar Sanghi) seema Judge SEEMA RANI 2015.02.26 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh