Tofik v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-19478-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19478-2026 Decided on : 17.04.2026 Tofik . . . Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana . . . Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present :

Ms. Neha Bindal, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

Mr. Ashwani Kumar Saini, DAG Punjab Mr. Waqar Ahmed Khurshid, Advocate for the complainant (through V.C.) **** SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) 1.

The instant petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 (earlier Section 439 Cr.P.C.), for grant of regular bail to the petitioner, during the pendency of trial, who has been booked in a criminal case arising out of First Information Report, as detailed hereunder:- Name of Petitioner(s) FIR No.

Date Section(s) Police Station District Tofik, aged 39 years 14.11.2024 191(3), 190, 115(2), 351(3), 109(1) of BNS (Corresponding Sections 147, 148, 323, 307, 506 IPC) and Sections 25-5459 of Arms Act Sadar Tauru Nuh 2.

Co-accused Saddik, though has been granted bail because he was alleged to be armed with danda.

As per allegations, petitioner was holding a gun in his hand and there REENA 2026.04.17 05:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-19478-2026 are total eight persons who suffered injuries. 3.

Faced with the situation and without arguing much, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition at this stage. 4.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn at this stage. April 17, 2026 (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE reena Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether Reportable:

Yes/No REENA 2026.04.17 05:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh