Poonam And ANR v. State Of Punjab And ORS




    
     

 Date of decision: 16th February, 2016  Poonam and another  Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others  Respondents     !"  #
  #
 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

None for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Brar, Asstt. Advocate General, Punjab for respondents No.1 to 3.

None for respondent No.4.



 #
$% "& Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Tarlochan Singh, Police Station City Nakodar, submits that the private respondent No.4 Sarbjit Kaur, mother of petitioner No.1, has made statement before the police that they have no objection to the relationship of the petitioners and shall not give them threats or take law in their hands.

Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners and nothing survives in this petition, the same stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous.

%  #
&  

'()*+),$


 RATTAN PAL SINGH 2016.02.19 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court