Dhanpati Devi v. State Of Hy.Tc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CWP No.11815-2001(O&M) Date of Decision: 05.05.2025 Dhanpati Devi ....Petitioner vs.

State of Haryana and others ....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL

Present:

Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to consider her for promotion as Assistant Sub Inspector/Sub Inspector from the date her juniors have been promoted.

2.

Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana submits that as per status report, all due benefits have been extended to the petitioner. The respondents, during the pendency of petition, passed order dated 20.04.2010 (Annexure R-1) which is not under challenge. As all the dues stand cleared, the petition may be disposed of.

3.

Mr. Ankur Sheoran, Advocate states that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to challenge order dated 20.04.2010 (Annexure R-1), if her grievance survives.

PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.05.05 04:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

CWP No.11815-2001(O&M) -24.

In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with the liberty as prayed by the petitioner. 5.

Pending Misc. application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 05.05.2025 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable:

No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2025.05.05 04:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document