Deepak Kundu v. State Of Haryana

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....

Criminal Misc. No.M-42785 of 2018 Date of decision:28.9.2018 Deepak Kundu

...Petitioner

v.

State of Haryana

...Respondent

....

Coram:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Inderjit Singh .....

Present:

Mr. Ajit Singh Lamba, Advocate for the petitioner. .....

Inderjit Singh, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.0102 dated 19.04.2018 registered for the offences under Sections 120-B, 167, 197, 198, 202, 218, 420, 421, 424, 465, 467, 471 and 477-A IPC at Police Station Bhuna, District Fatehabad.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the record.

As per the allegations in the FIR, the petitioner, who was Additional Associate IPF in the Bank, gave no due certificate before the closure of loan account. As per the FIR, `44 Lakhs loss had been caused due to the lapse of the Bank official as well as involvement of the borrower. There is nothing, at this stage, to show that no due certificate has been HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.10.01 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Cr. Misc. No.M-42785 of 2018 [2] correctly issued by the present petitioner to the borrower. It is the case of the prosecution that the borrower, after taking no due certificate without closing the loan account, again obtained the loan on the basis of documents mortgaged/hypothecated with the Bank etc.

Keeping in view the serious allegations against the present petitioner, I find that the petitioner is required for custodial interrogation, therefore, no ground is made out for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Therefore, finding no merit in this petition, the same is dismissed.

September 28, 2018.

(Inderjit Singh) Judge *hsp* NOTE:

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether reportable:

No HARPAL SINGH PARMAR 2018.10.01 10:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh