Sahil v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-21541-2024 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH Sr. No.207 CRM-M-21541-2024(O&M) Date of decision :22.07.2024 Sahil ..... Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH

Present:

Mr. Himmat Singh Deol, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for Complainant. ***** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) 1.

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in case FIR No.20 dated 15.03.2024, under Sections 324, 326, 450 of IPc and Section 307 added later on, registered at Police Station Rohdai, District Rewari. 2.

Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Surinder Singh of the concerned Police Station submits that in compliance of order dated 22.05.2024, the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not required for any further investigation.

3.

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petition is allowed. Order dated 22.05.2024 passed by this Court, is hereby made absolute.

4.

This order should not be treated as "blanket" order. It will not be read granting the petitioner(s) indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any KAVITA NAIN 2024.07.23 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment other incident that involves commission of an offence.

CRM-M-21541-2024 (O&M) 2 5.

This order does not in any manner limit or restrict the rights or duties of the police or investigating agency to investigate into the charges against the petitioner(s).

6.

The petitioner(s) shall be deemed to be in custody for the purpose of Section 27 of the Evidence Act in regard to a discovery of facts made in pursuance of information supplied by the petitioner(s) in case the occasion arises.

7.

It will be open to the police or the investigating agency to move to this Court for a direction under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. to arrest the accused, in the event of violation of any term, such as absconding, noncooperating during investigation, evasion, intimidation or inducement to witnesses with a view to influence outcome of the investigation or trial. 8.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.

(KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 22.07.2024 Kavita Nain Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KAVITA NAIN 2024.07.23 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment