Rahul Kumar v. Union Of India And ORS

R-336

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH FAO No.1729 of 2001 Date of Decision: 06.05.2024 Rahul Kumar .....Appellant.

Versus

Union of India .....Respondent.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ***** Present:- None for the appellant.

Mr. Navjit Singh, Central Government Counsel, UOI appearing as proxy counsel for Mr. Ashutosh Dhankar, Panel Counsel, UOI for the respondent.

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J.(Oral) As reported by the Registry, notice issued to the appellant has been received back with the report that he is not residing at the given address. None has put in appearance in the Court to represent the appellant. It is pertinent to mention here that on 05.02.2024, 29.02.2024 and 05.04.2024 also, the appellant had remained unrepresented.

2.

In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecution. Resultantly, the same stands dismissed, accordingly.

(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) May 06, 2024 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes Whether Reportable:

No YAG DUTT 2024.05.07 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment