Anita v. State Of Punjab And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 111 Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-42764 of 2016 (O & M) Date of Decision: December 01, 2016 Anita ..... PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Punjab & others ..... RESPONDENTS . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL Singh . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. A.K. Vermani, Advocate, for the petitioner. . . .

Jaspal Singh, J (Oral) 1.

Notice of motion.

2.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. R.P.S. Sidhu, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents - State. Let a copy of the petition be supplied to him during the course of the day. 3.

By virtue of the instant petition preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioner has sought appropriate direction(s) to respondent No.2 - Commissioner of Police, Amritsar City.

4.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that though representation dated November 03, 2016 (Annexure P-2) was moved to Commissioner of Police, Amritsar City, but till date, no action has been taken.

Avin Kumar 2016.12.03 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No.M-42764 of 2016 [2] 5.

The instant petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 - Commissioner of Police, Amritsar City, to look into the grievances unfolded by the petitioner in representation dated November 03, 2016 (Annexure P-2) and if some substance is found, to take appropriate action in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 6.

It is however directed that enquiry be entrusted to some gazetted officer of the rank of ACP/ DSP.

(Jaspal Singh) December 01, 2016 Judge avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No Avin Kumar 2016.12.03 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document