Vikram v. State Of Haryana

-1CRM-M-41936 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-41936 of 2017 Date of Decision: 16.11.2017 Vikram ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN Present: - Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Surender Singh, AAG, Haryana.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been made for grant of regular bail to petitioner, namely, Vikram in a case arising from FIR No.166 dated 21.11.2016 registered under sections 302, 323, 34 and 506 IPC at Police Station Bapoli.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner is in custody since 22.11.2016. Co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Sandeep has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 07.10.2017 passed in CRM-M-28055 of 2017. The conclusion of trial shall take a long time. No useful purpose would be served by detaining the petitioner in jail.

On the other hand, learned State counsel vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioner. Considering over-all facts and circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Ravinder Singh 2017.11.17 13:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Consequently, petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on the same parity

-2CRM-M-41936 of 2017 as that of his co-accused Sandeep, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds, to the satisfaction of Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned. (RAMENDRA JAIN) November 16, 2017 JUDGE R.S.

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Ravinder Singh 2017.11.17 13:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document