Anju Kohli v. Ut Of Chandigarh And ORS.

CRR-179-2010 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-179-2010 Date of decision : 14.11.2025 ANJU KOHLI .... PETITIONER

Versus

UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Ms. Ramandeep Kaur, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) for the complainant.

Mr. Rajiv Vij, Addl. P.P., U.T., Chandigarh.

*** H.S. Grewal, J.(Oral) 1.

The present matter pertains to the year 2010. On 23.09.2025, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and consequently, notice was issued to the petitioner as well as to counsel representing the petitioner. 2.

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has no instructions from the petitioner to argue the matter. 3.

Learned State counsel submits that the whereabouts of the petitioner are not known.

4.

In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution as the counsel has no instructions from the petitioner. (H.S.GREWAL) JUDGE 14.11.2025 renu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes/No Whether reportable :

Yes/No Renu Rawat 2025.11.14 15.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document