Artinder Kaur v. Union Of India And ORS

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Civil Writ Petition No. 12140 of 2021 Date of Decision: 08.07.2021 Dr.Artinder Kaur ... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Union of India and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.

Present:

Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Abhilaksh Gaind, Advocate for the National Highways Authority of India. Anil Kshetarpal, J.

1.

The petitioner is the owner of 7 kanals & 5 marlas of land, situated in village Aujla, Tehsil and District Gurdaspur. The Union Government has issued the notifications under Section 3-A and 3-D of the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1956 Act"). The petitioner claims that she is the owner of gair mumkin land, whereas in the notifications issued by the Union of India, it has been shown "agriculture land". The petitioner is stated to have filed the representations/objections before the competent authority. 2.

Through this writ petition, the petitioner prays that the competent authority be directed to consider the objections filed by the petitioner before passing an award as provided under Section 3-G of the 1956 Act.

3.

The award, as required under Section 3-G of the 1956 Act, is DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2021.07.09 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Civil Writ Petition No. 12140 of 2021 yet to be passed. This Court has no doubt that the competent authority will consider all the aspects of the matter including the representations/objections filed by the petitioner while passing the award. With the observations made above, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge July 08, 2021 "DK"

Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2021.07.09 15:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document