Suraj Verma And ORS v. State Of Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

Sr. No.: 114 Criminal Miscellaneous No.M-22463 of 2023 Date of Decision: May 18, 2023 Suraj Verma & others ..... PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

State of Haryana ..... RESPONDENT(S) . . .

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA . . .

PRESENT: - Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms. Mahima Yashpal, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

. . .

Tribhuvan Dahiya, J (Oral) This petition has been filed seeking direction to the trial Court to expedite the trial in Sessions case No.141 of 2021 titled The State of Haryana vs. Suraj Verma & others.

2.

The charges were framed on 19.10.2021. There is no document/short order on record to establish as to what transpired after framing of the charge, nor learned counsel for the petitioner is in a position to explain anything about it. He has only referred to the order dated 20.02.2023 (Annexure P-3), wherein on account of non-appearance of the prosecution witnesses, bailable warrants in the sum of ` 2,000 each were issued by the trial Court for 17.05.2023.

AVIN KUMAR 2023.05.19 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment

2023:PHHC:072090 CRM No.M-22463 of 2023 [2] 3.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Kulwinder, submits that talks for settlement were also going on between the parties, and on that account, the trial has not progressed. 4.

In view thereof, no direction needs to be issued. 5.

Disposed of.

(Tribhuvan Dahiya) Judge May 18, 2023 avin Whether Speaking/ Reasoned:

Yes/ No Whether Reportable:

Yes/ No AVIN KUMAR 2023.05.19 16:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment