Reema And Another v. Union Territory Chandigarh And Others

CRWP-3536-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRWP-3536-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.04.2025 Reema and another ....Petitioners

Versus

Union Territory, Chandigarh and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Present:

Mr. Amit Kashyap, Advocate for the petitioners.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) 1.

The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 11.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners, both consenting adults, decided to live together. They informed their families of their decision, but faced strong objections due to their families' orthodox views and concerns about social reputation and traditional marriage customs. Despite efforts to explain that they are well-settled, mature individuals with future goals, the families continued to oppose their live-in relationship and the said relationship is not acceptable to respondents No.4 to 11 and they are threatening the petitioners with dire consequences. The petitioners apprehend danger to MOHD YAKUB 2025.04.08 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh

CRWP-3536-2025 their life and liberty from respondents No.4 to 11 and in this regard, submitted a representation dated 06.04.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken so far. 3.

Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 4.

Mr. Tapan Masta, APP, U.T., Chandigarh, who is present in Court, accepts notice for the official respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to learned State counsel during course of the day. 5.

Without commenting on the relationship of the petitioners and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-3) within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if there is any threat to their life and liberty in accordance with law. 6.

It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them.

(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 08.04.2025 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No Whether reportable:

Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2025.04.08 16:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh