Shagandeep Singh v. State Of Punjab

-1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: December 23, 2015 Shagandeep Singh ......Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI 1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr.J.S.Bhandohal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.K.S.Pannu, DAG, Punjab.

........

NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CRM-40375-2015 Criminal miscellaneous application for exemption is allowed in terms of the prayer made, subject to all just exceptions.

CRM disposed of.

CRM-M-42034-2015 Prayer in this petition, filed under Section 439, Cr.P.C.,

-2is for grant of bail to the petitioner, Shagandeep Singh, son of Harmail Singh, resident of village Akoi Sahib, Police Station, Sadar, Sangrur, Tehsil and District Sangrur, who has been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34,IPC, in a case arising out of FIR No.87, dated 11.10.2015, registered at Police Station, Sadar Sangrur, District Sangrur.

Learned counsel contends that on account of a petty issue a quarrel had originated in which Simranjit Singh son of Lal Singh, informant, had sustained an injury on his stomach by way of kirch. Initially three persons were named as assailants but during investigation it was found that Ramandeep Singh was not present at the spot. He further submits that during pendency of the investigation, the informant has resolved his dispute and effected a compromise with the petitioner. He further submits that Simranjit Singh, the injured was discharged from the hospital on 23.10.2015 when his injury was fully cured and at present Simranjit Singh is leading a normal life. He further submits that the petitioner is neither required nor involved in any other case; the charge-sheet (challan) has been presented and, as such, the further incarceration of the petitioner would not be of any consequence.

-3Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Jagga Singh, Police Station, Sadar, District Sangrur, very fairly concedes that petitioner is neither required nor involved in any other case; after recovery, Simranjit Singh, the injured was discharged from the hospital on 23.10.2015 and that informant who is father of the injured has resolved his dispute and effected a compromise with the petitioner.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the material available on record, the present petition is accepted. The petitioner, Shagandeep Singh, son of Harmail Singh, resident of village Akoi Sahib, Police Station, Sadar, Sangrur, Tehsil and District Sangrur is ordered to be released on bail during pendency of the trial of the present case, subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/ Duty Magistrate, Sangrur.

December 23, 2015 (NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) meenu JUDGE