Rashi Gupta v. State Of Punjab

Crl. Misc. No. M-42976 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Sr. No. 203 Case No. : Crl. Misc. No. M-42976 of 2016 Date of Decision : January 31, 2017 Rashi Gupta ....

Petitioner vs.

State of Punjab ....

Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL.

* * * Present :

Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Yadav, AAG, Punjab.

* * * DEEPAK SIBAL , J.

:

Through this petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 136 dated 29.10.2016, registered under Sections 420, 120-B IPC, at Police Station Division No. 2, District Pathankot.

While issuing notice of motion on 01.12.2016, this Court had granted ad-interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to her joining investigation and conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has joined investigation. However, her passbooks, where the amount of pension credited in her account is reflected, are needed from the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner, in Court, has handed over Monika 2017.01.31 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Crl. Misc. No. M-42976 of 2016 the same to ASI, Ramesh Kumar, who is also present in the Court. In view of the above, learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is no longer required, at this stage, for any further questioning by the investigating agency.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed and order dated 01.12.2016 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made absolute subject to the conditions prescribed under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ( DEEPAK SIBAL ) JUDGE January 31, 2017 monika Whether speaking/reasoned ?

Yes/No.

Whether reportable ?

Yes/No.

Monika 2017.01.31 17:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document