Rajeev Arora v. Meena Dawar And Others

TA-617-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.102 TA-617-2023 Date of Decision: 25.02.2025


 ....Applicant

Versus

   
 


 .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present:- None for the applicant.

Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate for the respondents.

***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) Case called twice. However, none has made appearance on behalf of the applicant.

In view of the applicant not pursuing the transfer application, the counsel for the respondents, has drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph No.4 of the reply filed, wherein, it is stated about the majority to be attained by the daughters, in November 2021 and January 2024, relating to whom, the guardianship petition was filed. Considering the recitals of paragraph No.4 of the reply, seemingly, the applicant is not interested to pursue with the present transfer Sonu 2025.02.25 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC

TA-617-2023 application and precisely, on this account, no one is making appearance on behalf of the applicant.

Hence, the transfer application is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.

(ARCHANA PURI) 25.02.2025 JUDGE Himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned :

Yes Whether reportable :

Yes/No Sonu 2025.02.25 15:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document P&HHC