Sudesh Kumari And Another v. State Of Haryana And Others

2024:PHHC:061090 CWP-10129-2024 -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10129-2024 Date of Decision: 03.05.2024 Sudesh Kumari and another

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Jai Parkash Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana *** TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to promote the petitioners as PGT Sanskrit as their juniors have been promoted. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance raised herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondents. At this stage, the petitioners will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending representations, dated 15.03.2024 and 20.02.2024, Annexures P-3 and P-4 respectively, in a specified period. 3.

Notice of motion.

4.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice and submits that appropriate action will be taken by the second respondent on the PAYAL 2024.05.03 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

2024:PHHC:061090 CWP-10129-2024 -2pending representations, dated 15.03.2024 and 20.02.2024, within a period of three months.

5.

In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.

6.

Ordered accordingly.

(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 03.05.2024 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2024.05.03 15:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment