Manoj Kumar @ Manu Nagpal v. State Of Punjab

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21159-2020 Date of Decision: 03.11.2020 Manoj Kumar @ Manu Nagpal ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL

Present:

Mr. C.L.Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. M.S.Nagra, AAG, Punjab.

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)
 



        

         

  
 

 



  

 



  

  

            



  





    !"#$ %& '( '% )'*+

 



  , $  

  ))$- *.+/  At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner admits that trial is at the fag end and one prosecution witness is yet to be examined. However, he states that the petitioner has been in custody for the last more than 02 years.

On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that out of 14 prosecution witnesses, 01 witness i.e. Clerk of D.T.O. Office is yet to be examined.

In view of the above, but without going into the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial at the earliest.

03.11.2020




  

 

 















 
Note:

0 

  1

  23 1$ 0 



   1$

PARVEEN KUMAR 2020.11.03 01:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document