High Court of Punjab and HaryanaCRM-M/21809/2020disposed of

Tejo v. State Of Haryana

2020-10-16Mr. Justice Amol Rattan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH 116) CRM-M-21809 of 2020 Date of Decision: 16.10.2020 Tejo

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH Present:- Mr. Balwant Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Amrik Singh Kalra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Goel, DAG, Haryana.

Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral) All the cases listed today have been taken up for hearing by way of video conferencing because of the situation existing due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

By this petition, filed under the provisions of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks the concession of bail, upon FIR no.130, datd 05.09.2018, having been registered at Police Station Alewa, District Jind, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 and 323 of the IPC.

Pursuant to the order of this court dated 07.08.2020, a report has been received from the Sessions Judge and Addl. Sessions Judge, Jind, stating to the effect that the trial has in fact concluded on 23.09.2020 and the judgment pronounced, with the accused not having led any evidence in his defence.

Both, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the State, VIKAS CHANDER 2020.10.19 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

116) CRM-M-21809 of 2020 -2are ad idem that the petitioner has been convicted, thereby rendering this petition infructuous.

Disposed of as such.

16.10.2020 (AMOL RATTAN SINGH) vcgarg JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes Whether reportable:

No VIKAS CHANDER 2020.10.19 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document