Sangeeta Bansal v. State Of Haryana

CRM-M-21123 of 2020 and CRM-M-21553 of 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21123 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION :- November 16, 2020 Sangeeta Bansal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CRM-M-21553 of 2020 Mukesh Kumar Bansal

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN Present:- Mr. Varun Singh Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Kirpal Singh Thakur, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the complainant. *** The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant has stated that petitioners Mukesh Kumar Bansal and Sangeeta Bansal have gone abroad and in that way they have absconded. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Chand Ram corroborates this fact.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he has no instructions and information in that regard, however, he has prayed that he PARVINDER SINGH 2020.11.18 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh

CRM-M-21123 of 2020 and CRM-M-21553 of 2020 be permitted to withdraw both the petitions bearing CRM-M-21123 of 2020 filed filed by petitioner Sangeeta Bansal and CRM-M-21553 of 2020 filed by petitioner Mukesh Kumar Bansal. In view of such prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, both the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE November 16, 2020 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARVINDER SINGH 2020.11.18 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh