Rajesh v. State Of Haryana

KUMAR MANOJ 2015.12.19 13:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- 42288 of 2015 #1#

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- 42288 of 2015 Date of Order: 18.12.2015 Rajesh ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana ....Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI

Present:

Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana.

*** 1.

Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? AJAY TEWARI, J (ORAL) Prayer is for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.528 dated 04.09.2015 under Sections 18/28 of NDPS Act and Section 420 IPC, P.S City Rohtak.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has been falsely roped in as the Opium was recovered from the co-accused of the petitioner and nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and even that the recovery is of non-commercial quantity. It is contended that the petitioner has been in custody for three months and nine days.

Learned state counsel has accepted the factual assertion that the recovery was effected from the co-accused of the petitioner.

CRM-M- 42288 of 2015 #2# Without commenting upon the merits of the case, and keeping in view the facts of the present case and that the trial is not going to conclude in near future, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody. Accordingly, the petitioner is admitted to bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Rohtak. Petition stands disposed of.

December 18, 2015 (AJAY TEWARI) manoj JUDGE